🔗 Share this article

For a brief period, Trump gave the impression to take a firm approach regarding the Ukrainian conflict. Following issuing warnings of "serious ramifications" during the summer should Putin persisted obstructing peace discussions, the former president eventually imposed substantial restrictions on the Russian biggest energy firms, Lukoil and Rosneft. This decision substantially affected the Russian leader's ability to support his aggression in Ukraine.

Yet, with his latest detailed peace plan for the conflict, that was created by American and Russian diplomats without Ukrainian or EU input, he has apparently gone back to his pro-Putin stance.

Benefiting Military Action

This initiative would in practice favor the Russian leader for invading Ukraine while putting Ukraine's democratic system in danger. Although bold statements that "Ukraine's sovereignty will be affirmed", large portions of the proposal effectively weaken that same autonomy. This constitutes a Russian ideal would likely be a disaster for Ukraine.

Showing his real-estate background, the former president continues to consider the war as a mere territorial dispute, implying giving Russia a portion of Ukraine's land will satisfy the ruler. Yet, Putin's invasion is not merely about controlling a destroyed region of industrial-devastated land in the Donbas region. It is about the nation's political system – and the Russian leader's clear intention to eliminate it so it ceases to acts as an attractive standard for the Russian citizens of the responsible government that his increasing autocracy denies them.

Territorial Surrenders

While maintaining in status the currently separated Ukrainian provinces of Zaporizhzhia and Kherson, Trump's initiative would force the nation to give up the entire Donetsk province. Beyond rewarding Russia with area that its military have been unable to capture in more than a decade of warfare, this surrender would leave Ukrainian defensive positions severely compromised.

Donetsk is the site of the nation's well-known "defensive line", the well-established military defenses that are a critical barrier to invading forces. The proposal would have Ukraine surrender these fortifications, providing Russian forces a unobstructed way to Kyiv in case he later opt to restart the war.

Defense Limitations

Then, in a move that would facilitate renewed hostilities more feasible for the Russian military, Trump would require Ukraine to cut the size of its troops from their current large number soldiers to a maximum of this lower number. Significantly, Trump's proposal places no similar limits on the invading army.

In what appears as a gesture to Putin's efforts to depict the nation's democratically elected leadership as radicals, Trump's plan states: "Every extremist belief system and activities must be opposed and banned." Apparently to emphasize this aspect, it insists that "Ukraine will hold political contests in three months" of a peace deal. At the same time, Trump places no obligation that Putin jeopardize his authoritarian rule by conducting votes in his own country.

Defense Commitments

Admittedly, the initiative includes Russia promise not to "attack other states" and to "enshrine in regulation its policy of peaceful relations towards the EU and the Ukrainian people". Yet considering that the Russian leadership has violated similar agreements in the previous instances – including the 1994 agreement, in which the Russian government committed to recognize Ukraine's sovereignty in exchange for surrendering its historical atomic arms, and the previous peace deals, in which Russia promised to a truce and a restoration of occupied land in the region to Kyiv – why should anyone have confidence in Putin now?

For this reason Ukraine has been so adamant on external security guarantees. While the proposal promises a "immediate unified armed reaction" if Russia renew its military campaign, and states that "The nation will receive dependable security guarantees", the specifics vary from unclear to concerning. The plan would not just deny Ukraine accession to NATO but also preclude member states from deploying military personnel on the nation's land, effectively blocking the security presence, reportedly commanded by the UK and France, on which the Ukrainian government had been relying to stop Putin from restoring his reduced troops, rearming, and resuming aggression.

International Response

An additional supplementary accord apparently would provide Ukraine with a similar to NATO protection assurance, in which any future "significant, planned, and sustained aggression" by Russia on Ukraine "would be considered as an act of war threatening the stability and safety of the transatlantic community." This indicates a military response. However in contrast to a strong Ukraine's armed forces – the nation's best protection against future invasion – the credibility of the side agreement would hinge on the willingness of Nato leaders, including the US administration, to act militarily to Putin's hostilities, an action they have {not