🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “complete double standards” for opposing anti-smoking regulations in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

Zambian lobbying efforts

A letter obtained by media originating from the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the country’s government ministers demands plans to ban tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be canceled or deferred.

The tobacco firm seeks amendments to a pending law that include decreasing the proposed size of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on flavored smoking items, and reduced sanctions for any companies violating the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“If I was a politician, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and perpetuate the death of the Zambian people,” commented Master Chimbala.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year succumb to cigarette-linked health conditions, according to WHO calculations.

The campaigner stated the letter was known to have been circulated to several government departments and was in distribution within civil society groups.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

The situation emerges alongside expanded apprehension about corporate intervention with health policies. Last month, global health authorities raised concerns that the tobacco industry was escalating campaigns to undermine international regulations.

“Evidence exists of industry lobbying everywhere. Corporate signatures are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN high-level meeting,” stated Jorge Alday.

Possible outcomes

“If a tobacco control measure fails to be approved because of this letter, the price could be paid in individuals' health who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The public health measure going through Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and stipulating that visual health alerts cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

In the letter, the corporation proposes this be decreased to thirty to fifty percent “following international recommended threshold”, postponed for minimum 12 months after the law is enacted.

Global health authorities specifically advises a alert needs to encompass at least 50% of the product container front “and aim to cover as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings are required to occupy sixty-five percent of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Scented product controversy

BAT asks for the removal of broad restrictions on scented smoking items, claiming that it would lead smokers to “illegally traded” products. It suggests restricting fewer varieties of “tastes inspired by desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. All flavoured cigarettes have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The pending regulation proposes sanctions for different infractions “extending from a fraction of annual sales to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Business explanation

Via documentation, the corporate leader of the Zambian branch claims the firm is “committed to good corporate behaviour” and “backs the goals of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the associated health impact” but maintains that “specific rules can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Campaigner rebuttal

Chimbala said BAT’s proposed changes would “weaken this legislation so much that the impact needed for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that many such provisions were present in the UK, where the corporation is based, was “complete contradiction”, he stated.

“We exist in a connected world. Should I grow cigarettes in my property and harvest that and distribute the goods – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to profit individually and all the future family lines while my neighbor's family are perishing … is in itself complete moral collapse.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the Britain or other nations had not caused companies to close, the advocate mentioned. “Regulations don't close the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Standard business position

The company representative stated: “The corporation runs its business in compliance with applicable local laws. Additionally, the firm contributes in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the appropriate structures which enable interested party involvement in regulation development.”

The company was “not against rules”, they said, mentioning that minors should be safeguarded against acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We support evolving legislation to achieve intended population health targets, while recognizing the range of rights and obligations on businesses, users and involved parties,” they said, noting that the corporation's recommendations “reflect the realities of the Zambian market and smoking product business, which includes growing volumes of black market activity”.

Zambia’s department of business, commercial affairs and industrial development was approached for comment.